The adidas Group’s central planning and controlling system is designed to continually increase the value of our Group and brands to maximize shareholder value. By improving our top- and bottom-line performance and optimizing the use of capital employed, we aim to maximize free cash flow generation. This is our principal goal for increasing shareholder value. Management utilizes a variety of decision-making tools to assess our current performance and to align future strategic and investment decisions to best utilize commercial and organizational opportunities.
FREE CASH FLOW AS INTERNAL GROUP MANAGEMENT
FOCUS
The cornerstone of our Group’s Internal Management
System is our focus on free cash flow generation, which we
believe
is the most important driver to sustain and increase
shareholder value. Free cash flow is comprised of operating
components (operating profit, change in operating working
capital and capital expenditure) as well as non-operating
components such as financial expenses and taxes. To maximize
free cash flow generation across our multi-brand organization,
brand management has direct responsibility
for
improving operating profit as well as optimizing operating
working capital and capital expenditure. Non-operating
items
such as financial expenses and taxes are managed centrally
by the Group Treasury and Tax departments. To keep Group and
brand management focused on ongoing performance
improvement,
a portion of the responsible managers’ total compensation
is variable and linked to a combination of operating profit,
operating working capital development, Group earnings before
tax, or relative / absolute stock price performance.
|
FREE CASHFLOW COMPONENTS |
|
![]() |
|
| 1) | Excluding goodwill and finance leases. |
OPERATING MARGIN AS KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
OF OPERATIONAL PROGRESS
Operating margin (defined as
operating profit as a percentage of net sales) is our Group’s
most important measure of operational success. It highlights
the quality of our top-line and operational efficiency. The
primary
drivers central to enhancing operating margin are:
Sales and gross margin development: Management focuses
on identifying and exploiting opportunities that not only provide
for future growth, but also have potential to increase gross
margin (defined as gross profit as a percentage of net sales).
Major levers for sustaining and enhancing our Group’s sales
and gross margin include optimizing our product mix,
increasing
the quality of distribution – with a particular focus
on controlled space – as well as supply chain efficiency initiatives,
and the minimization of clearance activities.
Operating expense control: Tight control of operating
expenses
is particularly important as we strive to leverage the
Group’s sales growth through to the bottom line. Marketing
working budget is our largest operating expense. It is one of
the most important mechanisms for driving top-line growth.
Therefore, we are committed to improving the utilization of
our marketing spend. This includes concentrating our communication
efforts (including advertising, retail presentation and
public relations) on key global brand initiatives and focusing
our promotion spend on well-selected partnerships with top
events, leagues, clubs and athletes. We also aim to increase
operational efficiency and reduce operating overhead expenses
as a percentage of sales. Refining business processes,
eliminating
redundancies and leveraging the scale of our organization
are important drivers in this respect.
|
KEY FINANCIAL METRICS |
|
![]() |
|
| 1) | Excluding goodwill and finance leases. |
We strive to maximize revenues and minimize costs by detailed
target setting, and we constantly monitor deviations in rolling
forecasts on a monthly basis. If necessary, action plans are
implemented
to optimize the development of the Group’s operating
performance.
OPTIMIZATION OF NON-OPERATING COMPONENTS
Our Group
also puts a high priority on the optimization of non-operating
components such as financial expenses and taxes, as these
items strongly impact the Group’s cash outflows and therefore
the Group’s free cash flow. Financial expenses are managed
centrally by our Group Treasury department.
see Treasury The Group’s current and future tax expenditures are optimized
globally by our Group Taxes department.
TIGHT OPERATING WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
Due to
a comparatively low level of fixed assets required in our business,
operating working capital management is a major focus
of our efforts to improve the efficiency of the Group’s balance
sheet. We have made major strides in this area through tight
working capital management focused on continuously improving
our Group’s inventories, accounts receivable and accounts
payable.
Our key metric is operating working capital as a percentage of net sales. Monitoring the development of this key metric facilitates the measurement of our progress in improving the efficiency of our business cycle. We strive to manage our inventory levels to meet market demand and ensure fast replenishment. Inventory ageing is controlled to reduce inventory obsolescence and to optimize clearance activities. As a result, stock turn development is the key performance indicator as it measures the number of times the average inventory is sold during a year, highlighting the amount of capital locked in products in relation to our Group’s business. To minimize capital tied up in accounts receivable, we strive to continuously improve collection efforts in order to reduce the Days of Sales Outstanding (DSO) and improve the ageing of accounts receivable. Likewise, we strive to continuously optimize payment terms with our suppliers to best manage our accounts payable.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE TARGETED TO MAXIMIZE FUTURE
RETURNS
Improving the effectiveness of the Group’s capital
expenditure is another lever to maximize the Group’s free cash
flow. Our capital expenditure is controlled with a top-down,
bottom-up approach: In a first step, Group Management
defines
focus areas and an overall investment budget based
on investment requests by brand management. Our operating
units then align their initiatives within the scope of assigned
priorities and available budget. We evaluate potential return on
planned investments utilizing the net present value or internal
rate of return method, in relation to the cost of capital. Specific
investments are assessed according to the principles of risk-weighted
returns. For large investment projects, timelines and
deviations versus budget are monitored on a monthly basis
throughout the course of the project.
M & A ACTIVITIES FOCUS ON LONG-TERM VALUE CREATION
POTENTIAL
We expect the majority of our Group’s growth to
come from organic business. However, as part of our commitment
to ensuring sustainable profitable development,
we
regularly
review merger and acquisition options
that may provide
additional commercial and operational
opportunities.
Acquisitive
growth focus is primarily related
to a potential for
increasing market penetration, strengthening our Group’s
positioning
within a sports category or addressing new consumer
segments. The strategies of any potential acquisition
candidate must correspond with the Group’s long-term
direction.
Maximizing return on invested capital above the cost
of capital is a core consideration in our decision-making process.
Of particular importance is evaluating the potential
impact
on our Group’s free cash flow. We assess
current and
future projected key financial metrics to evaluate a target’s
contribution potential. In addition, careful consideration is
given to any potential financing implications which may be
required to complete a prospective acquisition.
COST OF CAPITAL METRIC USED TO MEASURE INVESTMENT
POTENTIAL
Creating value for our shareholders by earning a
return on invested capital above the cost of that capital is a
guiding principle of our Group strategy. We source capital from
equity and debt markets. Therefore, we have a responsibility
that our return on capital meets the expectations of both equity
shareholders and creditors. Our Group calculates the cost of
capital utilizing the weighted average cost of capital (WACC)
formula. This metric allows us to calculate the minimum
required
financial returns of planned capital investments. The
cost of equity is computed utilizing the risk-free rate, market
risk premium and beta. Cost of debt is calculated using the
risk-free rate, credit spread and average tax rate.
STRUCTURED PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM
Our
Group has developed an extensive performance measurement
system, which utilizes a variety of tools to measure the performance
of the adidas Group and our brand segments. To
evaluate the Group’s current sales and profitability development,
we monitor our annual budget on a monthly basis,
addressing
shortfalls and identifying additional opportunities.
Further, we monitor operating margin developments at all
brands on a monthly basis. To optimize the Group’s balance
sheet, we control operating working capital movement via a
monthly monitoring system. When negative deviations exist
between
actual
and target numbers, we perform a detailed
analysis to identify and address the cause. In addition, we
benchmark the Group and brand results with those of our major
competitors on a quarterly basis. We measure the Group’s
future
top-line development on the basis of our order backlog
development. Order backlogs comprise orders received within
a period of up to nine months in advance of the actual sale. Our
order book represents approximately 70 % of future anticipated
revenues. Also
increasingly important are other indicators
such as our own-retail activities and at-once business, which
are not represented
in the order book. We provide updates on
these developments as part of our quarterly reports.
see Outlook
MANAGEMENT APPRAISAL OF 2007 PERFORMANCE AND
TARGETS FOR 2008 AND 2009
We communicate our Group’s
financial targets on an annual basis. We also provide updates
throughout the year as appropriate. In 2007, we achieved all
key financial targets within the focus of our Internal Management
System. We outperformed global industry and macroeconomic
growth, increased our earnings at a double-digit rate, and made
strong debt reduction progress during the year.
see Economic and Sector Development
By segment, development at adidas and TaylorMade-adidas Golf exceeded our initial sales expectations while the Reebok segment performed marginally below initial expectations. At Reebok, strong sales increases in the emerging markets, particularly in Asia and in Eastern Europe, could not fully compensate lower than anticipated revenues in North America and the UK. The deliberate limitation of sales to mall-based customers in North America contributed to this development. Management took this decision to reduce product discounting at retail and protect brand image.
For 2008 and 2009, we have again committed to ambitious
targets
which will help us optimize our Group’s free cash flow
development going forward. Despite lower expected global
economic
growth in 2008, we believe the current trading
environment
will not negatively impact these expectations
given
the high percentage of growth we expect to come from
emerging markets and the positive impetus of the major sporting
events during the year. We believe
our targets are realistic
within the scope of the current trading environment, and no
material event between the end of 2007 and the publication of
this report has altered our view.
see Subsequent Events
TARGETS VERSUS ACTUAL KEY METRICS
| 2006 Actual |
2007 Initial Target |
2007 Actual |
2008 Target |
2009 Target |
|
| Group sales growth (currency-neutral) | 53 % | mid- single- digit |
7 % | high- single- digit |
high- single- digit |
| adidas segment sales growth (currency-neutral) |
14 % | mid- single- digit |
12 % | high- single- digit |
|
| Reebok segment sales growth (currency-neutral) |
(6 %)1) | low- single- digit |
0 % | low- to mid- single- digit |
|
| TaylorMade-adidas Golf segment sales growth (currency-neutral) |
13 %1) | mid- single- digit1) |
9 %1) | mid- single- digit |
|
| Group gross margin | 44.6 % | 45 – 47 % | 47.4 % | 47,5 – 48 % | 46 – 48 % |
| adidas segment gross margin | 46.2 % | increase | 47.4 % | increase | |
| Reebok segment gross margin | 35.0 % | increase | 38.7 % | increase | |
| TaylorMade-adidas Golf segment gross margin |
43.9 % | increase | 44.7 % | increase | |
| Group operating expenses (in % of sales) | 36.7 % | increase | 39.2 % | increase | |
| adidas segment operating expenses (in % of sales) |
35.4 % | stable | 35.6 % | increase | |
| Reebok segment operating expenses (in % of sales) |
32.8 % | increase | 35.8 % | increase | |
| TaylorMade-adidas Golf segment operating expenses (in % of sales) |
33.5 % | increase | 34.4 % | increase | |
| Group operating margin | 8.7 % | approx. 9 % | 9.2 % | at least 9,5 % |
approx. 11 % |
| adidas segment operating margin | 11.9 % | increase | 12.9 % | increase | |
| Reebok segment operating margin | 3.5 % | increase | 4.7 % | increase | |
| TaylorMade-adidas Golf segment operating margin |
8.5 % | decrease | 8.1 % | increase | |
| Net income growth (attributable to shareholders) | 26 % | ≤ 15 % | 14 % | at least 15 % |
double- digit |
| Operating working capital (in % of net sales) | 25.8 % | < 25 % | 25.2 % | further reduce | further reduce |
| Capital expenditure (€ in millions) 2) |
277 | 300 – 400 | 289 | 300 – 400 | 300 – 400 |
| Net debt (€ in millions) | 2,231 | < 2,000 | 1,766 | maintain or reduce |
1) On a like-for-like basis.
2) Excluding goodwill and finance leases.